Spray Nozzle Dynamics: Flow Rate, Pressure & Velocity Formulas
The governing equations for industrial spray nozzle performance — flow rate vs. pressure, droplet size vs. pressure, spray velocity, coverage area, liquid flow coefficient (K-factor), and turn-down ratio — with worked examples using real industrial numbers
The five governing equations for spray nozzle performance: (1) Flow rate scales with the square root of supply pressure — doubling pressure increases flow by 41%, not 100%. (2) Droplet size scales with the inverse square root of pressure — doubling pressure reduces Dv50 by about 29%. (3) The liquid flow coefficient K-factor relates flow rate directly to pressure: Q = K × √P. (4) Spray velocity at the nozzle orifice is calculated from Bernoulli's equation: v = Cv × √(2gΔP/ρ). (5) Coverage area at standoff distance depends on spray angle: A = π × (d × tan(θ/2))² for full-cone or A = 2d × tan(θ/2) × W for flat-fan. All formulas below include worked examples with industrial units (GPM, PSI, inches, mm).
Every spray nozzle performance question — "How much will flow change if I increase my supply pressure?", "What size nozzle do I need to deliver 8 GPM at 60 PSI?", "Will my droplets be smaller if I reduce pressure to 30 PSI?" — is answered by a small set of fluid mechanics equations that are straightforward to apply once the relationships are understood.
The most important concept to internalize before applying any of these formulas: nozzle flow rate is not linearly proportional to pressure. It scales with the square root of pressure. This means that doubling supply pressure from 40 to 80 PSI increases flow rate by 41% — not 100%. To double flow rate, you must quadruple pressure. This square-root relationship governs all hydraulic spray nozzle performance — flat-fan, full-cone, hollow-cone, spiral, and solid-stream — and is the single most important equation on this page.
Formula 1: Flow Rate vs. Supply Pressure
The fundamental square-root relationship that governs all hydraulic spray nozzle performance
Q₂ = Q₁ × √(P₂ ÷ P₁)
- Q₁Known flow rate at the known pressure P₁ (GPM, L/min, or m³/hr)
- Q₂Calculated flow rate at the target pressure P₂ (same units as Q₁)
- P₁Known supply pressure at nozzle inlet (PSI or bar)
- P₂Target supply pressure at nozzle inlet (same units as P₁)
This formula assumes the nozzle orifice geometry is unchanged. Both pressures must be gauge pressure measured at the nozzle inlet — not at the pump outlet. Pressure drop in the supply pipe from pump to nozzle must be subtracted from pump outlet pressure to find actual nozzle inlet pressure.
A flat-fan nozzle delivers 2.5 GPM at 40 PSI. What flow rate will it deliver at 80 PSI?
Given: Q₁ = 2.5 GPM, P₁ = 40 PSI, P₂ = 80 PSI Q₂ = 2.5 × √(80 ÷ 40) = 2.5 × √2 = 2.5 × 1.414 Q₂ = 3.54 GPM — a 41% increase, not 100%, despite doubling the pressureA full-cone nozzle is rated 10 GPM at 60 PSI. What flow will it deliver if supply pressure drops to 30 PSI?
Given: Q₁ = 10 GPM, P₁ = 60 PSI, P₂ = 30 PSI Q₂ = 10 × √(30 ÷ 60) = 10 × √0.5 = 10 × 0.707 Q₂ = 7.07 GPM — a 29% reduction in flow from a 50% drop in pressurePractical Implication: To Double Flow Rate, You Must Quadruple Pressure
The square-root relationship means that to double a nozzle's flow rate, supply pressure must increase by a factor of 4 (not 2). At 40 PSI a nozzle delivers Q₁; at 160 PSI it delivers 2Q₁. This has important system design consequences: if a process requires more flow, increasing supply pressure is rarely as cost-effective as installing additional nozzles or selecting a larger-orifice nozzle at the same pressure. Conversely, a small drop in supply pressure — for example from 60 PSI to 50 PSI from line pressure drop at peak demand — reduces nozzle flow by about 9%, which is within the ±10% operational tolerance for most applications but should be monitored on systems with tight coverage uniformity requirements.
Formula 2: The Liquid Flow Coefficient (K-Factor)
The nozzle's unique hydraulic constant — simplifies flow calculation at any pressure
Q = K × √P
- QFlow rate (GPM when P is in PSI; L/min when P is in bar)
- KLiquid flow coefficient — unique to each nozzle orifice size and type; published in manufacturer data sheets
- PSupply pressure at nozzle inlet (PSI or bar — must match the units used to determine K)
K-factor is determined at the factory: K = Q_rated ÷ √P_rated. Once K is known for a nozzle, flow at any pressure can be calculated instantly. The K-factor is always specific to the pressure units used — a K-factor in GPM/√PSI is not directly usable in L/min/√bar calculations without conversion.
K = Q ÷ √P
Use this to find the K-factor from any known flow rate and pressure pair — then apply Formula 2A to find flow at any other pressure.
A spiral nozzle delivers 4.0 GPM at 20 PSI. Find K, then calculate flow at 45 PSI.
Step 1 — Find K: K = 4.0 ÷ √20 = 4.0 ÷ 4.472 = 0.894 (GPM/√PSI) Step 2 — Flow at 45 PSI: Q = 0.894 × √45 = 0.894 × 6.708 Q = 5.99 GPM at 45 PSIA process requires 7.0 GPM at 60 PSI. What K-factor nozzle is needed?
Required K = 7.0 ÷ √60 = 7.0 ÷ 7.746 = 0.904 (GPM/√PSI) Select a nozzle with K-factor ≥ 0.904 at 60 PSI. From manufacturer tables, find the nozzle model whose published K-factor most closely matches this value.Formula 3: Droplet Size vs. Supply Pressure
How median droplet diameter (Dv50) changes when supply pressure changes
Dv50₂ = Dv50₁ × (P₁ ÷ P₂)n
- Dv50₁Known median droplet diameter at pressure P₁ (µm)
- Dv50₂Calculated median droplet diameter at pressure P₂ (µm)
- P₁Known supply pressure (PSI or bar)
- P₂Target supply pressure (same units as P₁)
- nPressure exponent — typically 0.25–0.35 for hydraulic flat-fan and full-cone nozzles; 0.2–0.3 for hollow-cone; 0.3–0.4 for hollow cone at low pressures. Use n = 0.3 as a general estimate when the manufacturer's specific exponent is not available
Droplet size decreases as pressure increases — higher pressure produces finer spray. The relationship is weaker than the flow-pressure relationship: doubling pressure (P₂/P₁ = 2) reduces Dv50 by approximately 19% with n = 0.3. Manufacturer droplet size data (measured by laser diffraction per ISO 9276 or ASTM E799) should always be used in preference to formula estimates when available.
A flat-fan nozzle produces Dv50 = 450 µm at 30 PSI. What is the approximate Dv50 at 60 PSI? (n = 0.3)
Dv50₂ = 450 × (30 ÷ 60)⁰·³ = 450 × (0.5)⁰·³ (0.5)⁰·³ = e^(0.3 × ln(0.5)) = e^(0.3 × −0.693) = e^(−0.208) = 0.812 Dv50₂ = 450 × 0.812 Dv50₂ ≈ 365 µm at 60 PSI — approximately 19% finer droplets from doubling pressureFormula 4: Nozzle Orifice Exit Velocity
The velocity of liquid leaving the nozzle orifice — derived from Bernoulli's equation
v = Cv × √(2 × ΔP ÷ ρ)
- vLiquid exit velocity at the nozzle orifice (m/s or ft/s)
- CvVelocity coefficient — accounts for viscous losses in the nozzle; typically 0.85–0.98 for well-designed nozzles (use 0.92 as a general estimate)
- ΔPPressure differential across the nozzle (Pa if v in m/s; lb/ft² if v in ft/s)
- ρLiquid density (kg/m³ for SI; lb/ft³ for imperial) — water at 20°C: 998 kg/m³ or 62.3 lb/ft³
For water at typical industrial pressures, this simplifies to practical approximations. At 40 PSI (276 kPa): v ≈ 22.5 m/s (74 ft/s). At 80 PSI: v ≈ 31.9 m/s (105 ft/s). Exit velocity doubles when pressure quadruples (consistent with the √P relationship). Impact pressure on a surface equals ½ρv², so doubling velocity quadruples impact force.
Calculate the orifice exit velocity of water at 60 PSI (413 kPa) with Cv = 0.92.
Convert: ΔP = 60 PSI × 6,895 Pa/PSI = 413,700 Pa; ρ (water) = 998 kg/m³ v = 0.92 × √(2 × 413,700 ÷ 998) = 0.92 × √(829.2) = 0.92 × 28.8 v ≈ 26.5 m/s (87 ft/s) — the liquid velocity at the nozzle exit at 60 PSI supply pressureFormula 5: Spray Coverage Area at Standoff Distance
Calculating the spray footprint at a known distance from the nozzle tip
A = π × [d × tan(θ÷2)]²
- ACoverage area (ft² or m² — same units as d²)
- dStandoff distance from nozzle tip to target surface (ft or m)
- θFull included spray angle (degrees) — from manufacturer data sheet at operating pressure
- π3.14159
W = 2 × d × tan(θ÷2)
- WSpray width at the target surface (ft or m — same units as d)
- dStandoff distance from nozzle tip to target surface (ft or m)
- θFull included flat-fan spray angle (degrees) — typically 15°, 25°, 40°, 65°, 80°, 95°, 110°
The spray angle decreases as liquid viscosity increases and as pressure decreases below the nozzle's rated pressure. Always verify coverage at the actual operating conditions — a nozzle rated 80° at 40 PSI may produce only 70° at 20 PSI. Coverage overlap between adjacent nozzles: minimum 10–20% lateral overlap is recommended for uniform coverage; increase to 25–30% for coating or chemical dosing applications with strict uniformity requirements.
A 90° full-cone nozzle is mounted 18 inches (1.5 ft) above a conveyor. What is the coverage area?
θ = 90°; θ/2 = 45°; tan(45°) = 1.0; d = 1.5 ft Coverage radius = 1.5 × tan(45°) = 1.5 × 1.0 = 1.5 ft A = π × (1.5)² = 3.14159 × 2.25 A = 7.07 ft² (0.657 m²) — coverage circle diameter = 3.0 ft (0.91 m)An 80° flat-fan nozzle is mounted 300 mm above a surface. What coverage width, and what spacing gives 20% overlap?
θ = 80°; θ/2 = 40°; tan(40°) = 0.839; d = 300 mm W = 2 × 300 × 0.839 = 503 mm coverage width per nozzle For 20% overlap: Nozzle spacing = 503 × (1 − 0.20) = 503 × 0.80 Nozzle spacing = 402 mm (16 inches) for 20% lateral overlap at 300 mm standoffFormula 6: Turn-Down Ratio and Operating Pressure Range
The ratio of maximum to minimum operating flow rate — and the pressure range it implies
TDR = Qmax ÷ Qmin = √(Pmax ÷ Pmin)
- TDRTurn-down ratio — the ratio of maximum to minimum usable flow rate while maintaining acceptable spray pattern
- Q_maxMaximum flow rate at maximum pressure (still within manufacturer's rated pressure range)
- Q_minMinimum flow rate at minimum pressure (below which spray pattern degrades unacceptably)
- P_maxMaximum rated operating pressure
- P_minMinimum pressure for acceptable spray pattern formation
Most hydraulic spray nozzles have a practical turn-down ratio of 2:1 to 3:1 — meaning the maximum flow rate is 2–3 times the minimum acceptable flow rate. A TDR of 2:1 corresponds to a 4:1 pressure ratio (P_max = 4 × P_min, since TDR = √(P_max/P_min) → P_max/P_min = TDR²). Air-atomizing nozzles achieve much higher turn-down ratios (10:1 or more) by independently varying liquid and air flow rates.
A flat-fan nozzle has a maximum rated pressure of 100 PSI and a minimum acceptable pattern pressure of 15 PSI. What is the turn-down ratio?
TDR = √(P_max ÷ P_min) = √(100 ÷ 15) = √6.67 = 2.58 Q at 100 PSI: Q_max = K × √100 = 10K; Q at 15 PSI: Q_min = K × √15 = 3.87K TDR = 2.58 : 1 — this nozzle can modulate flow over a 2.6× range while maintaining acceptable spray pattern. If wider turndown is required, use an air-atomizing nozzle or multiple nozzle banks switched in/out.Formula 7: Orifice Area and Nozzle Sizing
Calculating required orifice diameter from a target flow rate and pressure
Ao = Q ÷ (Cd × √(2ΔP÷ρ))
- AₒRequired orifice cross-sectional area (m² or in²)
- QRequired volumetric flow rate (m³/s or in³/s)
- CdDischarge coefficient — accounts for contraction and friction at the orifice edge; typically 0.60–0.80 for sharp-edged orifices; 0.80–0.95 for well-rounded nozzle exits
- ΔPPressure differential across the nozzle (Pa or lb/in²)
- ρLiquid density (kg/m³ or lb/in³)
Design requires 3.0 GPM at 40 PSI through a single orifice. What minimum orifice diameter? (Cd = 0.75, water at 20°C)
Convert: Q = 3.0 GPM × 6.309×10⁻⁵ m³/s per GPM = 1.893×10⁻⁴ m³/s ΔP = 40 PSI × 6,895 = 275,800 Pa; ρ = 998 kg/m³ Aₒ = 1.893×10⁻⁴ ÷ (0.75 × √(2 × 275,800 ÷ 998)) = 1.893×10⁻⁴ ÷ (0.75 × 23.50) Aₒ = 1.893×10⁻⁴ ÷ 17.625 = 1.074×10⁻⁵ m² Diameter = √(4 × 1.074×10⁻⁵ ÷ π) = √(1.369×10⁻⁵) = 3.70×10⁻³ m Required orifice diameter ≈ 3.70 mm (0.146 inches) — select next standard orifice size above this value from manufacturer tablesSymbol Reference and Unit Conversions
Complete reference for all variables used in this guide — with common industrial unit conversions
| Symbol | Variable Name | Common Units | Conversion Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q | Volumetric flow rate | GPM, L/min, m³/hr | 1 GPM = 3.785 L/min = 0.227 m³/hr; 1 L/min = 0.264 GPM |
| P | Supply pressure (gauge) | PSI, bar, kPa | 1 PSI = 0.0689 bar = 6.895 kPa; 1 bar = 14.50 PSI |
| K | Liquid flow coefficient (K-factor) | GPM/√PSI or L/min/√bar | K(GPM/√PSI) = K(L/min/√bar) × 0.0954 |
| Dv50 | Volume median diameter (VMD) | µm (micrometers) | Also written as D(v,0.5); 50% of spray volume in drops smaller than this; 1 mm = 1,000 µm |
| θ | Spray angle (full included) | Degrees (°) | Half-angle = θ/2; measured at the rated operating pressure; decreases with pressure reduction |
| d | Standoff distance | mm, inches, ft, m | Measured from nozzle orifice face to the target surface; not from nozzle body back |
| v | Exit velocity | m/s, ft/s | 1 m/s = 3.281 ft/s; at 60 PSI water ≈ 26–27 m/s with Cv = 0.92 |
| ρ | Liquid density | kg/m³, lb/ft³, lb/gal | Water at 20°C: 998 kg/m³ = 62.3 lb/ft³ = 8.33 lb/gal |
| Cd | Discharge coefficient | Dimensionless (0–1) | Sharp orifice: 0.60–0.65; rounded entry: 0.80–0.95; use 0.75 as general estimate |
| Cv | Velocity coefficient | Dimensionless (0–1) | Accounts for viscous losses; typically 0.85–0.98; use 0.92 as general estimate for industrial nozzles |
| TDR | Turn-down ratio | Dimensionless (e.g., 2.5:1) | TDR = Q_max/Q_min = √(P_max/P_min); hydraulic nozzles typically 2:1–3:1; air-atomizing up to 10:1 |
| n | Pressure exponent for droplet size | Dimensionless (0.2–0.4) | Flat-fan: 0.25–0.35; full-cone: 0.3–0.4; hollow-cone: 0.2–0.3; use 0.3 for general estimate |
| Aₒ | Orifice area | mm², in², m² | Circular orifice: Aₒ = π × (d_orifice/2)²; diameter from Aₒ: d = 2 × √(Aₒ/π) |
| W | Flat-fan spray width at standoff | mm, inches, ft | W = 2 × standoff × tan(θ/2); doubles when standoff doubles at constant angle |
All Formulas at a Glance
Quick reference — seven governing equations for industrial spray nozzle dynamics
Flow Rate vs. Pressure
Q₂ = Q₁ × √(P₂/P₁)Find flow at any pressure from one known data point
Flow from K-Factor
Q = K × √PFastest way to calculate flow when K is known from datasheet
K-Factor from Known Flow
K = Q ÷ √PDerive the K-factor from any rated flow/pressure pair
Droplet Size vs. Pressure
Dv50₂ = Dv50₁ × (P₁/P₂)ⁿEstimate median droplet diameter at a new pressure; n ≈ 0.3
Exit Velocity (Bernoulli)
v = Cv × √(2ΔP/ρ)Liquid velocity at nozzle orifice; drives impact force calculations
Coverage Area / Width
A = π×[d×tan(θ/2)]²Full-cone area; for flat-fan: W = 2×d×tan(θ/2)
Turn-Down Ratio
TDR = √(P_max/P_min)Ratio of max to min usable flow; relates to pressure operating range
Required Orifice Area
Aₒ = Q ÷ (Cd × √(2ΔP/ρ))Calculate minimum orifice size for a target flow at a given pressure
Five Things Every Process Engineer Should Know About Spray Nozzle Math
1. Measure pressure at the nozzle, not at the pump. Pipe friction losses between the pump and nozzle reduce the actual pressure available at the nozzle orifice. On long runs or with small diameter supply pipe: measure pressure with a gauge at the nozzle manifold inlet under full flow conditions — not from the pump gauge — before applying any of these formulas.
2. The square-root law means small pressure changes have small flow effects. A 10% drop in supply pressure (say, 60 to 54 PSI from a partially opened upstream valve) produces only a 5% drop in flow rate. This is often within measurement uncertainty — and within the ±5–10% flow tolerance for most industrial applications. But it also means that achieving a 50% flow reduction requires reducing pressure to 25% of its original value (P₂ = 0.25 × P₁).
3. Nozzle wear increases K-factor and flow rate — not just spray quality. As a nozzle orifice wears larger, K increases proportionally. A 10% increase in orifice diameter produces approximately a 21% increase in flow rate (since A ∝ d², and Q ∝ A). This over-application of liquid from worn nozzles is the most common undetected quality problem in high-volume spray applications: coating weight drift, chemical over-dosing, or cooling rate reduction from excessive water flux changing the boiling regime.
4. Spray angle changes with pressure — coverage calculations must use the angle at the actual operating pressure. Manufacturer spray angle specifications are measured at the rated pressure. Reducing pressure below rated reduces the included angle, which reduces coverage width and area at the same standoff distance. Always verify the nozzle's spray angle at your actual operating pressure rather than assuming the rated angle applies at all pressures.
5. Viscosity shifts all performance curves. All formulas on this page assume water at near-ambient temperature. Liquids with viscosity above approximately 20 cP produce progressively larger droplets, reduced flow rates, and narrower spray angles compared to water at the same pressure. For viscous liquids: obtain manufacturer's viscosity correction curves or test at actual conditions — do not apply water-based formulas directly to viscous liquid spray specification.
Frequently Asked Questions — Spray Nozzle Formulas
Direct answers to the most common spray nozzle calculation questions
How do I calculate spray nozzle flow rate from supply pressure?
Use the K-factor formula: Q = K × √P, where Q is flow rate (GPM), K is the nozzle's liquid flow coefficient (GPM/√PSI — from the manufacturer's data sheet), and P is supply pressure at the nozzle inlet in PSI. Example: a nozzle with K = 1.2 GPM/√PSI at 40 PSI delivers Q = 1.2 × √40 = 1.2 × 6.32 = 7.58 GPM. If you don't have the K-factor but have one rated flow/pressure pair from the datasheet, derive K = Q_rated ÷ √P_rated, then apply Q = K × √P for any other pressure. If you have two rated pressure conditions, use Q₂ = Q₁ × √(P₂/P₁) — no K-factor needed.
What is the relationship between spray nozzle pressure and flow rate?
Flow rate is proportional to the square root of supply pressure — not directly proportional. The governing equation is Q ∝ √P, which means: doubling pressure increases flow by 41% (√2 = 1.414); tripling pressure increases flow by 73% (√3 = 1.732); quadrupling pressure doubles flow (√4 = 2.0). This square-root relationship is the most important and most frequently misunderstood aspect of spray nozzle hydraulics. It applies to all hydraulic (liquid-pressure-driven) spray nozzles — flat-fan, full-cone, hollow-cone, spiral, and solid-stream. It does not apply to air-atomizing (two-fluid) nozzles, where droplet size is controlled by the air-to-liquid ratio rather than liquid pressure alone.
What is a spray nozzle K-factor and how do I use it?
The K-factor (also called the flow coefficient or discharge coefficient) is a constant that characterizes a specific nozzle orifice's flow rate at any pressure. It is defined as K = Q ÷ √P, where Q is flow rate and P is pressure. Once K is known, flow at any pressure within the nozzle's rated range can be calculated instantly: Q = K × √P. Manufacturers publish K-factors in their nozzle catalogs, typically alongside flow rate tables at multiple pressures. You can also calculate K from any two values in the manufacturer's flow-pressure table: K = Q₁ ÷ √P₁ — the result should be consistent across all table entries (within rounding error). K-factors are unit-dependent: a K in GPM/√PSI is different from the same nozzle's K in L/min/√bar. The unit conversion is: K(GPM/√PSI) = K(L/min/√bar) × 0.0954. K-factor is particularly useful for selecting a nozzle size: if your process requires a specific flow rate at a specific pressure, calculate the required K = Q_required ÷ √P_operating, then select the nozzle model whose published K-factor most closely matches.
How does increasing pressure affect droplet size in a spray nozzle?
Increasing supply pressure decreases droplet size (produces finer spray). The relationship is: Dv50₂ = Dv50₁ × (P₁/P₂)ⁿ, where n is typically 0.25–0.35 for most hydraulic nozzles. At n = 0.3: doubling pressure reduces Dv50 by about 19%; quadrupling pressure reduces Dv50 by about 33%. The effect is less dramatic than the flow-pressure relationship — pressure is a relatively inefficient way to change droplet size over a wide range. To achieve very fine droplets (<50 µm) from a hydraulic nozzle, pressures above 300–500 PSI are typically required, which creates high flow rates. If very fine droplets are required at moderate flow rates: air-atomizing (two-fluid) nozzles are more effective, using compressed air at the orifice to produce 10–80 µm droplets at liquid supply pressures as low as 10–30 PSI.
How do I calculate the spray coverage area at a given standoff distance?
For full-cone nozzles (circular coverage): A = π × [d × tan(θ/2)]², where d is the standoff distance and θ is the full spray angle in degrees. For flat-fan nozzles (rectangular coverage): Coverage width W = 2 × d × tan(θ/2), and coverage area = W × nozzle body length (for a continuous flat-fan). Example for full-cone: a 60° nozzle at 12 inches (1.0 ft) standoff: A = π × [1.0 × tan(30°)]² = π × [1.0 × 0.577]² = π × 0.333 = 1.05 ft². Coverage diameter = 2 × 1.0 × tan(30°) = 2 × 0.577 = 1.154 ft (13.85 inches). Important: the spray angle used must be the actual angle at the operating pressure — the rated angle at the rated pressure. Reduce the angle by 5–10% as a conservative estimate if operating below rated pressure.
What is turn-down ratio for a spray nozzle and why does it matter?
Turn-down ratio (TDR) is the ratio of maximum to minimum usable flow rate while maintaining an acceptable spray pattern. TDR = Q_max/Q_min = √(P_max/P_min). Most hydraulic spray nozzles have a TDR of 2:1 to 3:1 — the maximum flow is 2–3 times the minimum acceptable flow. Below the minimum pressure, the spray pattern degrades (flat-fan nozzles drool, full-cone nozzles produce uneven distribution) and the nozzle should not be operated. TDR matters for variable-flow applications where the process requires different flow rates at different times — for example, a chemical dosing system where the line speed varies. If a process requires a TDR above 3:1, options include: (1) air-atomizing nozzles (TDR up to 10:1); (2) multiple nozzle banks that can be switched on/off to step-change flow while each bank operates within its rated pressure range; (3) variable orifice nozzles specifically designed for wide TDR. Standard hydraulic nozzles operated below their minimum pressure produce flow that is technically measurable but with degraded coverage uniformity that typically makes the spray ineffective for the application.
Apply These Formulas to Your Specific Nozzle Specification
Tell us your target flow rate, supply pressure, liquid properties, and coverage requirement — our application engineers will apply these formulas to your specific system and recommend the correct nozzle type, orifice size, and operating pressure range.